A note about MilliSievert amounts:
The MilliSieverts (mSv) listed on this site are estimates derived from various sources which include medical literature as well as the medical expertise of our executive medical staff who are long standing thought leaders in the field of radiology.
There are various factors that impact the actual patient dose received during a specific procedure. These include age, body size, and technical factors, such as the type of test, distance to the body part, length of the procedure as well as the skill and experience of the operator. This site is to provide you with general estimates and not to suggest that the amounts shown here are exact.
References used in the creation of this site:
Amis ES, Jr., Butler PF, Applegate KE, et al. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 2007; 4(5):272-284.
Balter S, Schueler B, Miller D, Cole P, et al, Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures: The RAD-IR Study Part III: Dosimetric Performance of the Interventional Fluoroscopy Units J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004; 15:919-926.
Beebe M, Dalton JA, Espronceda M, Evans DD, Glenn RL. CPT 2007 standard edition: current procedural terminology. Chicago: American Medical Association Press, 2006.
Bhargavan M, Sunshine JH. Utilization of radiology services in the United States: levels and trends in modalities, regions, and populations. Radiology 2005;234:824-32.
Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, et al. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003;100:13761-6.
Brenner DJ. Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 2004;231:440-5.
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography - an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007;357:2277-84.
Brenner DJ. Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced. Br J Radiol 2008;81:521-3.
Buls N, Pagés J, de Mey J, Osteaux M. Evaluation of patient and staff doses during various CT fluoroscopy guided interventions. Health Phys 2003;85:165-73.
Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, National Research Council. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII phase 2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2006.
de González AB, Kim KP, Knudsen AB, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I,et al, Radiation-Related Cancer Risks From CT Colonography Screening: A Risk-Benefit Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 Apr;196(4):816-23.
Dietze G, Harrison JD, Menzel HG. Effective dose: a flawed concept that could and should be replaced: comments on a paper by D J Brenner (Br J Radiol 2008;81:521-3). Br J Radiol 2009;82:348-50.
Einstein AJ. Radiation protection of patients undergoing cardiac computed tomographic angiography. JAMA 2009; 301:545-7.
Einstein AJ, Henzlova MJ, Rajagopalan S. Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. JAMA 2007;298:317-23.
Einstein AJ, Moser KW, Thompson RC, Cerqueira MD, Henzlova MJ. Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation 2007;116:1290-305.
Fazel R, Krumholz H, Wang Y, et al. Exposure to Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation from Medical Imaging Procedures. NEJM 2009; 361:849-857.
Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council onCardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation 2009;119:1056-65.
Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J, et al. Image Gently(SM): a national education and communication campaign in radiology using the science of social marketing. J Am Coll Radiol 2008;5:1200-5.
Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F, et al. Estimated radiation
dose associated with
cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 2009;301:500-7.
Henzlova M, Cerqueria MD, Hansen CL, Taillefer R, Yao S. ASNC imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures:stress protocols and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16:331.
IMV 2005 nuclear medicine census market summary report. Des Plaines, IL: IMV Medical Information Division, 2005.
Jacob K, Vivian G, Steel JR. X-ray dose training: are we exposed to enough? Clin Radiol 2004;59:928-34.
Kailasnath P, Sinusas AJ. Technetium-99m-labeled myocardial perfusion agents: are they better than thallium-201? Cardiol Rev 2001;9:160-72.
Lee CI, Haims AH, Monico EP, Brink JA, Forman HP. Diagnostic CT scans: assessment of patient, physician, and radiologist awareness of radiation dose and possible risks. Radiology 2004;231:393-8.
McCollough CH. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce. Health Phys 2008;95:508-17.
Martin CJ. Effective dose: how should it be applied to medical exposures? Br J Radiol 2007;80:639-47.
Martin CJ. The application of effective dose to medical exposures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2008;128:1-4.
Mettler FA Jr, Thomadsen BR, Bhargavan M, et al. Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results. Health Phys 2008;95:502-7.
Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008;248:254-63.
Miller DL, Balter S, Cole P, Hollington L, et al, Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures: The RAD-IR Study Part I: Overall Measures of Dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003:14:711-727.
Miller DL, Balter S, Cole P, Hollington L, et al, Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology Procedures: The RAD-IR Study Part II: Skin Dose J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003:14:977-990.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States: recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Report no. 160. Bethesda, MD: NCRP, March 2009.
Nationwide Evaluation of X-Ray Trends (NEXT). Tabulation and
of 2000 survey of computed tomography. (CRCPD publication no. E-07-2.) Frankfort, KY: Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors, August 2007. (Accessed July 30, 2009, at http://www.crcpd.org/Pubs/NEXT_docs/NEXT2000-CT.pdf.)
Notes for guidance on the clinical administration of radiopharmaceuticals and use of the sealed radioactive sources. Oxon, United Kingdom: Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee, Health Protection Agency, March 2006.
Perisinakis K, Theocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Manios E, Vardas P, Gourtsoyiannis N. Fluoroscopically guided implantation of modern cardiac resynchronization devices: radiation burden to the patient and associated risks. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005;46:2335-9.
Perisinakis K, Damilakis J, Theocharopoulos N, Manios E, Vardas P, Gourtsoyiannis N. Accurate assessment of patient effective radiation dose and associated detriment risk from radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures. Circulation 2001; 104:58-62.
Prasad KN, Cole WC, Haase GM. Radiation protection in humans: extendingthe concept of as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) from dose to biological damage. Br J Radiol 2004;77:97-9.
Quinn AD, Taylor CG, Sabharwal T,Sikdar T. Radiation protection awareness in non-radiologists. Br J Radiol 1997;70:102-6.
Radiation Dose Asessment Introduction In: ACR Appropriateness Criteria®. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 2010.
Radiation protection in medicine: ICRP publication 105. Ann ICRP 2007; 37(6):1-63.
Radiological protection and safety in medicine: a report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1996;26(2):1-47. [Erratum, Ann ICRP 1997;27(2):61.]
Shiralkar S, Rennie A, Snow M, Galland RB, Lewis MH, Gower-Thomas K. Doctors' knowledge of radiation exposure:questionnaire study. BMJ 2003;327:371-2.
Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Larson EB. Rising use of diagnostic medical imaging in a large integrated health system.Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:1491-502.
Sources and effects of ionizing radiation: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) report to the General Assembly, with scientific annexes. Vol. 1.: Sources. New York: United Nations, 2000.
The 2007 recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection: ICRP publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007;37(2-4):1-332.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Regulation (10 CFR), subpart B - §20.1101: radiation protection programs. Washington, DC: Nuclear Regulatory Commission. (Accessed July 30,2009, at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/cfr/part020/part020-1101.html.)
Wennberg JE, Fisher ES, Stukel TA, Skinner JS, Sharp SM, Bronner KK. Use of hospitals, physician visits, and hospice care during last six months of life among cohorts loyal to highly respected hospitals in the United States. BMJ 2004;328:607.
Wrixon AD. New ICRP recommendations. J Radiol Prot 2008;28:161-8.